Alcohol withdrawal: advantage or harm
Everybody who regularly reads the latest news has the reason of being confused: why the views on different products and substances, such as fat, proteins, carbohydrates or alcohol are constantly changing – yesterday it was written that they are healthy, today it’s said that they are extremely detrimental to health, and tomorrow everything will be vice verse again… The hottest discussions usually arise around alcohol: some scientific researches indicate that it prevents from infarctions and strokes, others prove that it destroys liver and stimulates the disposition to aggression. How can be a discrepant character of alcohol explained? Here are the findings of one more investigation, on the example of which we’ll consider how the failures happen.
The latest research, carrying on the tradition of investigations of alcohol’s advantages and promising to become a real sensation is an article written by researchers-gerontologists from the University of Bari (Italy), which was published in an issue of “Neurology” magazine from 22.05.2007. In this article it is said that moderate drinkers suffer from senile dementia less than teetotallers. Having observed the group of aged italians, 1445 out of whom didn’t suffer from mental disorders and 121 of whom suffered from syndrome of mild cognitive impairment, the scientists found that this syndrome aggravated more quickly among those people, liable to mild cognitive impairment, who drank “less than one portion” of alcohol, than among those ones, who didn’t drink at all. Those, who drank more, had as poor results as teetotallers. So, wait for new headlines like “alcohol strengthens brains” or “drink a glass of vodka every day and you’ll never be in your dotage”.
The matter is that the researchers from Bari in their article didn’t make such categoric statements. They just mentioned that one glass a day, perhaps (perhaps!!) prevents from senile dementia. The history of such investigations shows that when the researches simply observe a large group of people, not resorting to active interference, it’s difficult to differentiate the influence of alcohol from others peculiarities of mode of life. In this article it is clearly said: “Perhaps, mild cognitive impairment is prevented with a temperate lifestyle as such (its certain peculiarities can differ under different national and cultural conditions). Consequently, cognitive impairment is prevented not with the influence of alcohol or its components directly”.
In other words, you can by yourself, relying on your own experience and common sense, explain how the taking of alcohol withdrawal is connected with the keenness of mentality. Then, you just won’t need any data of neurology. 70 year-old men and women, who regularly drink a glass of wine, for example, may drink moderately exactly because they keep a good physical shape, eat healthy food, don’t suffer from any serious deceases and, consequently, don’t take any drastic remedies, which are incompatible with alcohol. They may also actively communicate with people; and all these factors, as well as moderate taking of alcohol are connected, as the researchers have proved, with the keen wit preserving. Of course, when the researchers investigate the role of a certain factor, they try to differentiate it from the others. But in practice it is not always easy. There exist certain ethic norms, which don’t let the investigators make the patients drink defined doses of alcohol by force. The researchers’ power over their patients is limited, so they have to investigate what they can watch.



